Beyond Code Scanning: How BlueFlag's Identity-Centric Platform Tackles the SDLC Security Gaps

The Software Supply Chain Security Market: Gartner's Latest Insights

Gartner® has just released its comprehensive Market Guide for Software Supply Chain Security (April 2025), providing crucial insights into this rapidly evolving space. According to Gartner, "Attackers are targeting software supply chains that comprise open-source and commercial software dependencies, third-party APIs, and DevOps toolchains."

The report reveals a strategic planning assumption that “by 2028, 85% of software engineering teams in large enterprises will have deployed software supply chain security tools, up from 60% in 2025.” In our opinion, this rapid adoption reflects the urgency of addressing what Gartner identifies as key market challenges:

1. "The fragmented web of interdependencies between software artifacts, developer identities, development tools, and delivery pipelines creates visibility gaps in the software supply chain."
2. "Improper artifact integrity validation allows attackers to poison the software delivery pipeline and compromise the software being delivered."
3. "The lack of automated tools to enforce security policies and detect misconfigurations weakens the security posture of the software delivery process."

However, amid these challenges, we believe Gartner's market analysis reveals an even more fundamental issue that most organizations are failing to address.

The Dangerous Blind Spot: Toxic Interactions in the SDLC

As Gartner's Market Guide emphasizes, “the software supply chain also includes the automation tools, development environments, developer identities, and delivery pipelines used to develop, deliver, and operate software." The report notes that "Each of these entities and their interactions and relationships present another form of risk."

In our opinion, what Gartner is describing are what BlueFlag Security has coined as toxic interactions in the software development lifecycle (SDLC) – a term we created to explain this critical but often overlooked security phenomenon.

Toxic interactions occur when multiple issues overlap, creating conditions that attackers can exploit. For example, an overprivileged service account (identity) could exploit a misconfigured repository (tool) to deploy unreviewed code containing a critical vulnerability (code). Our platform continuously monitors behavior patterns and configurations to predict, detect, and remediate these toxic combinations before they can be exploited. Addressing these risks requires recognizing their interplay rather than viewing them in isolation.

These gaps aren't just theoretical. Real-world examples like the devastating EmeraldWhale breach further demonstrate the impact of toxic interactions, where attackers exploited a combination of excessive developer permissions, exposed configurations, and hardcoded credentials, resulting in over 15,000 stolen cloud service credentials and a fully compromised development pipeline. As Gartner notes, "securing the software delivery pipeline is a precondition to securing the software that is delivered."

Moving Beyond Code Scanning: The Identity-Centric Approach

Gartner's Market Guide outlines three critical use cases for SSCS tools:

1. “Gain full visibility into the SDLC” by managing third-party risks and maintaining an audit trail of activities
2. “Protect the integrity of software delivery” by signing and verifying build artifacts and ensuring provenance
3. “Improve security posture” by enforcing policies and detecting misconfigurations

At BlueFlag Security, we've pioneered an identity-centric approach to SDLC security that addresses these use cases by focusing on all three critical attack vectors:

• Developer identities: Who has access to what resources and can perform what actions, and are they behaving as expected?
• Development tools and pipelines: Are your DevOps tools configured securely to prevent unauthorized access?
• Code vulnerabilities: Is your code free from traditional security issues and properly validated?

This comprehensive approach directly addresses Gartner's emphasis on detection and prevention of unauthorized access: "Detect and prevent unauthorized access by human and machine identities to SDLC tools and environments" is listed as a Common Features in the Market Guide.

The BlueFlag Difference: Identity-Centric Security that Prevents, Detects, and Remediates Toxic Interactions

BlueFlag Security is recognized by Gartner as a Representative Vendor in the "Vendors offering stand-alone SSCS capabilities" category. We believe, what sets us apart is our identity-centric approach to preventing, detecting, and remediating these toxic interactions in the software development lifecycle.

At BlueFlag, we believe that developer identities are the source of risk, while code vulnerabilities are merely symptoms of this risk. This identity-centric philosophy enables us to detect and remediate security issues at their origin, before they manifest as breaches.

Our platform continuously monitors behavior patterns and configurations to predict and detect toxic combinations before they can be exploited. Beyond just detection, BlueFlag provides automated and guided remediation capabilities to fix these issues when they're found.

In our opinion, these capabilities align with two critical needs identified by Gartner. First, they address the requirement to "deploy behavioral analysis to predict SDLC security anomalies" through our detection of toxic interactions. Second, they respond to Gartner's observation that "the lack of automated tools to enforce security policies and detect misconfigurations weakens the security posture of the software delivery process" through our automated and guided remediation.

By focusing on the interplay of risks across the entire SDLC with an identity-centric lens, we believe BlueFlag aligns with Gartner's recommendations while going beyond what traditional code-scanning tools offer through our unique approach to preventing, detecting, and remediating toxic interactions.

Enterprise Use Cases: How BlueFlag Addresses Critical SDLC Security Needs

Gartner's Market Guide notes that " Application security (AppSec) teams reporting into the CISO were traditionally the only custodians of all aspects of application security, including SSCS.  This has shifted in recent years where both software engineering teams and platform engineering teams share responsibilities with AppSec teams for application security." This shift demands solutions that can address complex enterprise environments.

Based on our work with Fortune 500 companies across financial services, healthcare, and technology sectors, BlueFlag addresses four critical use cases:

1. Securing Developer Identities

Gartner highlights that "organizations have greater control over internal systems and little to no control over external entities." BlueFlag addresses this challenge through:

• Insider threat detection and remediation in development environments: Monitor internal developers or contractors for anomalous activity or toxic interactions, including the injection of malicious code, and remediate issues
• Entitlement management: Control, right-size, and remediate excess access to critical development resources
• Non-human identities management: Secure and remediate issues with service accounts, automation identities, and other machine users

The result is comprehensive protection of human and machine identities with built-in remediation capabilities.

2. SDLC Posture Management

Gartner emphasizes that "the lack of automated tools to enforce security policies and detect misconfigurations weakens the security posture of the software delivery process." BlueFlag addresses this through:

• Secure code repository posture/configurations: Ensure repositories maintain secure configurations and remediate drift
• CI/CD pipeline hardening: Protect build and deployment infrastructure from compromise and fix misconfigurations

This approach directly implements Gartner's recommendation to "improve the security posture of the software delivery process by using SSCS tools to automate policy enforcement in the SDLC as well as detect and resolve misconfiguration errors in DevOps tooling."

3. Code Governance & Security

Gartner notes that "reduce third-party risks using SCA to identify known vulnerabilities, software licenses, and operational risks, such as viability, credibility, and maintainability of embedded OSS. " BlueFlag supports this through:

• Software Composition Analysis (SCA): Identify, manage, and remediate vulnerable dependencies
• Infrastructure as Code (IaC) & Secrets scanning: Detect and remediate misconfigurations and exposed credentials before deployment

These capabilities align with Gartner's guidance to "reduce third-party risks using SCA to identify known vulnerabilities" and "reduce first-party risks by scanning internally developed code for secrets and potential security vulnerabilities."

4. Continuous Compliance of Development Environments

As Gartner notes, "Software engineering teams can also use these tools to meet regulatory and government mandates through the automated enforcement of security and compliance policies and automated attestations."

BlueFlag delivers this compliance through:

• Automated organization-level vulnerability management: Streamline vulnerability workflows and remediation across the enterprise
• Automated SDLC security policy management and governance: Implement and enforce security guardrails without impeding development
• Compliance with industry standard frameworks: Align with and remediate violations of CIS, NIST-800, ISO27001, SOC2, and others

This capability directly supports Gartner's recommendation to "satisfy governance and regulatory requirements by making the software delivery infrastructure auditable and automating enforcement of application security policies."

Implementing Gartner's Recommendations with BlueFlag

Gartner's Market Guide offers three clear recommendations for software engineering leaders:

1. "Close trust gaps by using SSCS tools to improve visibility, protect integrity, and enhance security posture throughout the SDLC."
2. "Advance your secure software development practices by integrating SSCS capabilities into DevOps pipelines to adhere to industry-recognized guidelines."
3. "Rationalize tooling by favoring vendors that integrate with your existing DevSecOps tools and support mandatory as well as optional features outlined in our market definition."

BlueFlag Security directly addresses these recommendations with our identity-centric approach, which prevents, detects, and actively remediates toxic interactions before they escalate into breaches.

What drives our approach is the recognition that developer identities represent the root cause of security risks, while code vulnerabilities are merely symptoms. Effective SDLC security requires addressing the source, not just treating the symptoms, before breaches can occur. This identity-centric approach provides a single pane of glass for security leaders to have meaningful conversations with engineering about the security profile of the developer environment at a strategic level.

The Gartner Market Guide forecasts that "according to the 2025 Gartner Technology Adoption Roadmap for Large Enterprises Survey, 60% of software engineering leaders reported they have either already deployed or are deploying SSCS, another 12% are piloting it and 13% are in the planning stage." This rapid adoption reflects the increasing complexity of software supply chains creating visibility gaps in the software supply chain.

In this complex landscape, BlueFlag's innovative, identity-centric approach to detecting and remediating toxic interactions offers comprehensive security—going beyond traditional tools to safeguard the entire development environment

Ready to implement Gartner's recommendations and protect your software supply chain from toxic interactions? Contact us today for a demo of BlueFlag Security.

Gartner, Market Guide for Software Supply Chain Security, 7 April 2025

GARTNER is a registered trademark and service mark of Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates in the U.S. and internationally and is used herein with permission. All rights reserved.

Gartner does not endorse any vendor, product or service depicted in its research publications, and does not advise technology users to select only those vendors with the highest ratings or other designation. Gartner research publications consist of the opinions of Gartner’s research organization and should not be construed as statements of fact. Gartner disclaims all warranties, expressed or implied, with respect to this research, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.

BlueFlag Security is backed by top-tier investors including 1011 Ventures, Maverick Capital, and Pier88 Ventures.